Abstract
Drawing on contract governance literature and institutional theory, this study investigates the differential effects of output- and behavior-based contract governance on buyer-supplier conflict in supply chains. The authors develop a contingent perspective to examine how institutional factors moderate the impact of contract governance. The findings, from an empirical study of buyer-supplier dyads in China, show that an output-based contract is negatively, whereas a behavior-based contract is positively, related to buyer-supplier conflict. The effects of a contract are moderated by two primary institutional factors: legal enforceability and unilateral government support. These findings have important implications for supply chain research, public policy, and managerial practice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 12-24 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Operations Management |
| Volume | 41 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Behavior-based contract
- Conflict
- Institution theory
- Legal enforceability
- Output-based contract
- Unilateral government support
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Contract governance and buyer-supplier conflict: The moderating role of institutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver