Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The relationship between cultural tightness–looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: a global analysis

  • Michele J. Gelfand*
  • , Joshua Conrad Jackson
  • , Xinyue Pan
  • , Dana Nau
  • , Dylan Pieper
  • , Emmy Denison
  • , Munqith Dagher
  • , Paul A.M. Van Lange
  • , Chi Yue Chiu
  • , Mo Wang*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Al Mustakilla Research Group
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • University of Florida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is a global health crisis, yet certain countries have had far more success in limiting COVID-19 cases and deaths. We suggest that collective threats require a tremendous amount of coordination, and that strict adherence to social norms is a key mechanism that enables groups to do so. Here we examine how the strength of social norms—or cultural tightness–looseness—was associated with countries' success in limiting cases and deaths by October, 2020. We expected that tight cultures, which have strict norms and punishments for deviance, would have fewer cases and deaths per million as compared with loose cultures, which have weaker norms and are more permissive. Methods: We estimated the relationship between cultural tightness–looseness and COVID-19 case and mortality rates as of Oct 16, 2020, using ordinary least squares regression. We fit a series of stepwise models to capture whether cultural tightness–looseness explained variation in case and death rates controlling for under-reporting, demographics, geopolitical factors, other cultural dimensions, and climate. Findings: The results indicated that, compared with nations with high levels of cultural tightness, nations with high levels of cultural looseness are estimated to have had 4·99 times the number of cases (7132 per million vs 1428 per million, respectively) and 8·71 times the number of deaths (183 per million vs 21 per million, respectively), taking into account a number of controls. A formal evolutionary game theoretic model suggested that tight groups cooperate much faster under threat and have higher survival rates than loose groups. The results suggest that tightening social norms might confer an evolutionary advantage in times of collective threat. Interpretation: Nations that are tight and abide by strict norms have had more success than those that are looser as of the October, 2020. New interventions are needed to help countries tighten social norms as they continue to battle COVID-19 and other collective threats. Funding: Office of Naval Research, US Navy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e135-e144
JournalThe Lancet Planetary Health
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2021
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The relationship between cultural tightness–looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: a global analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this