TY - GEN
T1 - Rating Distribution Calibration for Selection Bias Mitigation in Recommendations
AU - Liu, Haochen
AU - Tang, Da
AU - Yang, Ji
AU - Zhao, Xiangyu
AU - Liu, Hui
AU - Tang, Jiliang
AU - Cheng, Youlong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 ACM.
PY - 2022/4/25
Y1 - 2022/4/25
N2 - Real-world recommendation datasets have been shown to be subject to selection bias, which can challenge recommendation models to learn real preferences of users, so as to make accurate recommendations. Existing approaches to mitigate selection bias, such as data imputation and inverse propensity score, are sensitive to the quality of the additional imputation or propensity estimation models. To break these limitations, in this work, we propose a novel self-supervised learning (SSL) framework, i.e., Rating Distribution Calibration (RDC), to tackle selection bias without introducing additional models. In addition to the original training objective, we introduce a rating distribution calibration loss. It aims to correct the predicted rating distribution of biased users by taking advantage of that of their similar unbiased users. We empirically evaluate RDC on two real-world datasets and one synthetic dataset. The experimental results show that RDC outperforms the original model as well as the state-of-the-art debiasing approaches by a significant margin.
AB - Real-world recommendation datasets have been shown to be subject to selection bias, which can challenge recommendation models to learn real preferences of users, so as to make accurate recommendations. Existing approaches to mitigate selection bias, such as data imputation and inverse propensity score, are sensitive to the quality of the additional imputation or propensity estimation models. To break these limitations, in this work, we propose a novel self-supervised learning (SSL) framework, i.e., Rating Distribution Calibration (RDC), to tackle selection bias without introducing additional models. In addition to the original training objective, we introduce a rating distribution calibration loss. It aims to correct the predicted rating distribution of biased users by taking advantage of that of their similar unbiased users. We empirically evaluate RDC on two real-world datasets and one synthetic dataset. The experimental results show that RDC outperforms the original model as well as the state-of-the-art debiasing approaches by a significant margin.
KW - recommendation system
KW - self-supervised learning
KW - unbiased recommendation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85129845191
U2 - 10.1145/3485447.3512078
DO - 10.1145/3485447.3512078
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:85129845191
T3 - WWW 2022 - Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022
SP - 2048
EP - 2057
BT - WWW 2022 - Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022
PB - Association for Computing Machinery, Inc
T2 - 31st ACM Web Conference, WWW 2022
Y2 - 25 April 2022 through 29 April 2022
ER -