TY - GEN
T1 - Stepwise Reasoning Disruption Attack of LLMs
AU - Peng, Jingyu
AU - Wang, Maolin
AU - Zhao, Xiangyu
AU - Zhang, Kai
AU - Wang, Wanyu
AU - Jia, Pengyue
AU - Liu, Qidong
AU - Guo, Ruocheng
AU - Liu, Qi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Association for Computational Linguistics.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Large language models (LLMs) have made remarkable strides in complex reasoning tasks, but their safety and robustness in reasoning processes remain unexplored, particularly in third-party platforms that facilitate user interactions via APIs. Existing attacks on LLM reasoning are constrained by specific settings or lack of imperceptibility, limiting their feasibility and generalizability. To address these challenges, we propose the Stepwise rEasoning Error Disruption (SEED) attack, which subtly injects errors into prior reasoning steps to mislead the model into producing incorrect subsequent reasoning and final answers. Unlike previous methods, SEED is compatible with zero-shot and few-shot settings, maintains the natural reasoning flow, and ensures covert execution without modifying the instruction. Extensive experiments on four datasets across four different models demonstrate SEED's effectiveness, revealing the vulnerabilities of LLMs to disruptions in reasoning processes. These findings underscore the need for greater attention to the robustness of LLM reasoning to ensure safety in practical applications. Our code is available at: https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/SEED-Attack.
AB - Large language models (LLMs) have made remarkable strides in complex reasoning tasks, but their safety and robustness in reasoning processes remain unexplored, particularly in third-party platforms that facilitate user interactions via APIs. Existing attacks on LLM reasoning are constrained by specific settings or lack of imperceptibility, limiting their feasibility and generalizability. To address these challenges, we propose the Stepwise rEasoning Error Disruption (SEED) attack, which subtly injects errors into prior reasoning steps to mislead the model into producing incorrect subsequent reasoning and final answers. Unlike previous methods, SEED is compatible with zero-shot and few-shot settings, maintains the natural reasoning flow, and ensures covert execution without modifying the instruction. Extensive experiments on four datasets across four different models demonstrate SEED's effectiveness, revealing the vulnerabilities of LLMs to disruptions in reasoning processes. These findings underscore the need for greater attention to the robustness of LLM reasoning to ensure safety in practical applications. Our code is available at: https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/SEED-Attack.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021039757
U2 - 10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.251
DO - 10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.251
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:105021039757
T3 - Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
SP - 5040
EP - 5058
BT - Long Papers
A2 - Che, Wanxiang
A2 - Nabende, Joyce
A2 - Shutova, Ekaterina
A2 - Pilehvar, Mohammad Taher
PB - Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)
T2 - 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2025
Y2 - 27 July 2025 through 1 August 2025
ER -