跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

The relationship between cultural tightness–looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: a global analysis

  • Michele J. Gelfand*
  • , Joshua Conrad Jackson
  • , Xinyue Pan
  • , Dana Nau
  • , Dylan Pieper
  • , Emmy Denison
  • , Munqith Dagher
  • , Paul A.M. Van Lange
  • , Chi Yue Chiu
  • , Mo Wang*
  • *此作品的通讯作者
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Al Mustakilla Research Group
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • University of Florida

科研成果: 期刊稿件文章同行评审

摘要

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is a global health crisis, yet certain countries have had far more success in limiting COVID-19 cases and deaths. We suggest that collective threats require a tremendous amount of coordination, and that strict adherence to social norms is a key mechanism that enables groups to do so. Here we examine how the strength of social norms—or cultural tightness–looseness—was associated with countries' success in limiting cases and deaths by October, 2020. We expected that tight cultures, which have strict norms and punishments for deviance, would have fewer cases and deaths per million as compared with loose cultures, which have weaker norms and are more permissive. Methods: We estimated the relationship between cultural tightness–looseness and COVID-19 case and mortality rates as of Oct 16, 2020, using ordinary least squares regression. We fit a series of stepwise models to capture whether cultural tightness–looseness explained variation in case and death rates controlling for under-reporting, demographics, geopolitical factors, other cultural dimensions, and climate. Findings: The results indicated that, compared with nations with high levels of cultural tightness, nations with high levels of cultural looseness are estimated to have had 4·99 times the number of cases (7132 per million vs 1428 per million, respectively) and 8·71 times the number of deaths (183 per million vs 21 per million, respectively), taking into account a number of controls. A formal evolutionary game theoretic model suggested that tight groups cooperate much faster under threat and have higher survival rates than loose groups. The results suggest that tightening social norms might confer an evolutionary advantage in times of collective threat. Interpretation: Nations that are tight and abide by strict norms have had more success than those that are looser as of the October, 2020. New interventions are needed to help countries tighten social norms as they continue to battle COVID-19 and other collective threats. Funding: Office of Naval Research, US Navy.

源语言英语
页(从-至)e135-e144
期刊The Lancet Planetary Health
5
3
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 3月 2021
已对外发布

联合国可持续发展目标

此成果有助于实现下列可持续发展目标:

  1. 可持续发展目标 3 - 良好健康与福祉
    可持续发展目标 3 良好健康与福祉

指纹

探究 'The relationship between cultural tightness–looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: a global analysis' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。

引用此